05-25-2013, 10:59 PM
Add to all of this the constant pressure to put more and more into a car, along with making each successive iteration "slightly" bigger (compare a 1980's 3 series to a current one - the current one is bigger than a 1980's 5 series), only puts more and more pressure on manufacturers to "optimise" everything.
From the size of the radiator, suspension components, drive shafts, etc - everything is optimised to within an inch of its life now.
I one had a friend who had an old 1970's Chrysler Valiant that he wanted to junk. So they took it bush, trashed it mercilessly and yet it still ran. Ended up taking the air cleaner off the Darby and fed it small rocks - and it still ran. You could not kill this thing - it was over engineered which made it bullet proof. Now everything is optimised, rotating mass, inertia, etc, so that if one variable is wrong, the whole thing self destructs.
Don't get me wrong, the benefits are there in terms of performance and fuel economy, but also in the penalties if something goes wrong. Why is an AK47 so popular - because you can feed it mud and it will still fire. There are better rifles out there, but probably none are as robust as an AK47 (this coming from someone who lives in a nanny state where you cannot own an AK47) but the comparison is valid.
Everything down to the battery is "right/just" sized so as to be absolute minimum you need, nothing more. Is this a recipe for long term reliability?
From the size of the radiator, suspension components, drive shafts, etc - everything is optimised to within an inch of its life now.
I one had a friend who had an old 1970's Chrysler Valiant that he wanted to junk. So they took it bush, trashed it mercilessly and yet it still ran. Ended up taking the air cleaner off the Darby and fed it small rocks - and it still ran. You could not kill this thing - it was over engineered which made it bullet proof. Now everything is optimised, rotating mass, inertia, etc, so that if one variable is wrong, the whole thing self destructs.
Don't get me wrong, the benefits are there in terms of performance and fuel economy, but also in the penalties if something goes wrong. Why is an AK47 so popular - because you can feed it mud and it will still fire. There are better rifles out there, but probably none are as robust as an AK47 (this coming from someone who lives in a nanny state where you cannot own an AK47) but the comparison is valid.
Everything down to the battery is "right/just" sized so as to be absolute minimum you need, nothing more. Is this a recipe for long term reliability?

