As far as the re-tensioning, could we have a show of hands as to how many people have successfully done it it? By that I mean, how many people, after replacing their belts and setting the tension, went back in after the prescribed interval, checked the tension, confirmed that the belts had loosened, and successfully re-tensioned them?
I'm not asking this to be cynical. The reason I'm asking is that, as I've mentioned before, after my first belt change several years ago, I set my BS belt a little too tight, such that it whined for a few minutes of driving after having sat long enough to cool completely. Thinking that it would loosen up over time, I drove it several thousand miles, expecting the noise to diminish, but it didn't, not even in the slightest. So I went back in, loosened the belt a bit, and the noise went away. I'm interpreting this to mean that at least in my case, the belt didn't really loosen after the initial installation.
The other concern I have is that unless you have a P9201 tool, setting the belt tension is very subjective, plus setting the belt preload and belt-to-idler clearance is a very tedious and tricky task. A generous member here lent me his P9201 tool, and wow, what a difference. No guesswork, and a result that's virtually guaranteed to be perfect. I finally got the pre-load and clearance right, too, but it took a lot of patience.
My concern is that I'm not completely convinced that re-tensioning the belt isn't likely to do more harm than good. Now, if you have a P9201 tool, I would say that sways the decision in the direction of doing it.
So, I'm looking for some hard evidence that re-tensioning the belt makes a difference, as I wonder if, akin to the discussion in another thread on lubricants, the recommendation that was made by Porsche 20 years ago was correct at the time, but as the quality of belts has improved, is it possible that re-tensioning is no long necessary, and may even be counter-productive?