Doubtful that Porsche would consider producing a part which has
almost no history of failure. The two cases Jay highlighted are not necessarily indicative of an absolute defect of the tensioner itself without contributing factors ( improper tensioning or subsequent adjustment of the balance belt after replacement, neglect in checking the proper function and lubrication of the rollers and other components, etc etc …at least that’s what Porsche would argue ) . Heck, they didn’t even want to take responsibility for the pinion bearing failure which was a very well documented factory tolerance setting error and affecting numerous cars, so I do t see them being too worried about overall brand reputation if a few 968s here and there disappear off the roadways because of NLA parts . If they were 911s , that’d be a different story . But hey, I do hope that I’m wrong and Porsche will be convinced to remake this, and any other critical parts for which there are no alternatives and can render the cars useless, although I doubt they’re worried about their reputation if that happens to a few 968s..