Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

wing it or zing it?
#21

hmm, that's weird ; it looks a little better in the latest photo where the top is down, than the original one with the top up. Key operating words : "a little better".
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#22

I'm a "no". I think it looks to chunky and too obviously aftermarket. I get the idea of having a "handle" for the trunk, or "boot" as we call it in Austrlia and most other English speaking countries, but it is too obtrusive for me. If I really felt the need I might consider putting on one of the very subtle lips that you see on early AMG Mercs.



As for the aero aid aspect of the thing, unless you are spending lots of time at more than 65 mph it makes no difference at all.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#23

Nope even in the top down photo I don't like the look, the truck looks very interesting though!
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#24

In my opinoin, the rear spoiler make the looks of the Cab. A side shot of the car would really show that it improves the lines and offsets the splitter producing a more agressive look to the car. Since your car is lowered and has a nice splitter I think you would really improve the lines. Lines are very important to me... I have alway thought the the tail end of the cab just faded anyway and ended without much of a statement, the TechArt spoiler changes that. Since it does not require any drilling or mods to the trunk lid put it on and see if it grows on you. One bit of advise..... when securing the spoiler you fresh double stick tape and doulble up on it. When I first installed mine it slid back and the nuts on the brackets chipped my paint in inside of the car. After I found the "right" spot to position the spoiler, which took a least 2 bottles of good red wine, I placed a couple of small dabs of silicon under the spoiler to help hold it in place so it did not slide back again.



Cheers,
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#25

Looks a bit clumsy IMO. I really like how clean the back end of the 968 cab is.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#26

Hmmmm.... I have been having the same "yes, Maybe, No" self discussion concerning adding the factory AMG spoiler to the trunk lip of my 02 SL...

It doesn't need it from a performance standpoint... that SL has to weigh well over 4,500 lbs! So the rear end isn't going anywhere at the speeds I drive!

But... the trunk just sort of drops off, and I keep thinking that it needs something to sort of finish it off, like the 968 Cab... especially with the front splitter.

The AMG pack included a nice body kit, but the spoiler was optional, so I guess even AMG couldn't decide yes or no!



I think I vote for Bob to stick it on and let us see it from all directions!!!
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#27

Bob is no stranger to red wine so I'm sure it will go on and look the best it can be <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/smile.png" class="smilie" alt="" />
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#28

IMHO : looks too fat - I would prefer that it be just a lip, with an ever so slight uptick at the rear. I might feel differently seeing it in person, maybe.... It's not the worst thing ever done, by any stretch. And if it actually improves performance, that might make it look better.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#29

Looks even better in the second photo, IMO.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#30

Bob have you looked at it with and without red wine? Lol
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#31

without??? i don't understand
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#32

[quote name='flash' timestamp='1321576022' post='118131']

without??? i don't understand

[/quote]

<img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/icon_lol1.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#33

Speaking of red wine and cab wings, I just got back from lunch where three of us had two bottles of Nickel & Nickel ( Far Niente,s second label ) 2007 cab. and looking at ithe photos through wine colored glasses, I 'm still not convinced it,s something that enhances the cab lines at all. JMWIO. ( just my wine influenced opinion )
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#34

2 bottles for 3 people? Oh that's right I'm sorry it was lunch after all! Perhaps just wetting your whistle doesn't provide an accurate glance.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#35

it was a nearly three hour lunch ( what one would call a "civilized" way to eat ) so 2 bottles b/w 3 people is not THAT far out of reason..
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#36

How can there be anything wrong with a wine called Nickel and Nickel!!! I'm sure I have a few cases here next to the 2011 Gewurztraminer <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/smile.png" class="smilie" alt="" />



Dave Nickel
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#37

Ds you misunderstand me. 2/3 is certainly reasonable for lunch. Course if your not doing anything after lunch 3/3or 4/3 would have been even more reasonable. Following the old adage more is better!
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#38

Rap, I read it again, now I get it...



David, great coincidence, lol. And I'd go out and buy a case but at what I hear is about $ 80 / bottle retail ( still a lot cheaper than the winery's main label ) drinking it at lunch on someone else's expense account is about all the tasting I'll get of this ...



Speaking of wing or zing though, what do you guys think about the Strosek rocker panels on our car ?

Just as Flash is on the fence about the rear wing, I have the same conflict re adding those things...have been thinking for years about buying them , but not sure if it's going to look more like an add-on than factory ?



Here's a photo of them on the car, for the few who may not have not seen the Strosek yet.



   
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#39

phil968 also has the Strosek rocker panles on his Black coupe. I could not locate a good picture but they are there... <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/glare.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />

Maybe send Phil a PM and ask for better picture and his opinion...





   
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#40

i looked at those close up on the yellow cab. they really stick out quite a bit. i wouldn't mind adding the brake ducts that could be made functional, but they tend to date the car, just like the rear wing. i've been on the fence about them too.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
Last Post by Roboman
12-24-2020, 09:49 PM
Last Post by flash
11-29-2009, 09:29 PM
Last Post by Fox944
11-01-2008, 10:22 PM
Last Post by ds968
12-05-2005, 12:17 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)