05-06-2006, 11:53 AM
nope - not a flowery tale of a season's changing - well, sort of....
time once again to revisit the suspension for the season, and tweak it a bit more
what i had in the car was konis up front with porsche motorsport eibach/tech art progressive springs - these calculate to a linear rate of 160/250 - given the angle of the strut, and some load tests, that gives an effective rate of 144/225, though loaded it was more like 190/225 when driving because the first 2.5 coils were almost always compressed
what i had in the rear were torsion delete with carrera shocks valved for this car, with eibach 2.5" dia x 10" long 250# linear springs - given my modified rear mounting geometry, and reduced rear weight, this equated to an effective rate of 187.5
this provided a VERY nice ride under moderate conditions - the front had nice give to it, accommodating bumps well, and the rear wasn't bouncing me around - but, start throwing the car around, and it was really depending on the alignment geometry and the tires to stick - it really felt too soft, especially in the rear - at initial set, the car was very balanced - remember, that my intial rate was 190 or so, and the rear was 187.5 - nice balance - then it would load and get stiffer in the front, making the rear seem like it was dragging aroung a bit
also keep in mind that the stock rates are 160f/175r
my thought is to change my rear rate to 300 and the front to 250 - that would give me an effective front of 225 or so and rear of also 225 - the idea here is to firm up the rear, while not losing the front loaded rate, and try to balance the car without making the ride too harsh for street (yes, i know this is a nearly impossible compromise goal)
i realize that the racers out there would spring the car a lot heavier - i would too for a race car - that is not the goal here - this is to remain a street car, but i am looking for better tuning - i also realize that the first instinct is to spring the front more than the rear, by an increase of 10-20% - that is also what i have always done in the past - i was also dealing with a car that was generally 52/48
i know the math works - it's just a bit counter-intuitive, based on experience
here's the question - who else has played around with this? i am looking for input from somebody who has also corner balanced the car - i am working hard to get an even distribution of weight and spring reaction, increase handling and cornering, while not losing ride comfort in a street car
working on the presumption that i have moved the weight around sufficiently to achieve a 50/50 balance at 1/2 tank and including driver, i'm doing this today to see where i am, but i have a couple of days before i can get it back in for it's next alignment (lol - ugh - 9th now in 2 years i think)
thoughts? (besides that i am nuts and should just leave the car alone)
time once again to revisit the suspension for the season, and tweak it a bit more
what i had in the car was konis up front with porsche motorsport eibach/tech art progressive springs - these calculate to a linear rate of 160/250 - given the angle of the strut, and some load tests, that gives an effective rate of 144/225, though loaded it was more like 190/225 when driving because the first 2.5 coils were almost always compressed
what i had in the rear were torsion delete with carrera shocks valved for this car, with eibach 2.5" dia x 10" long 250# linear springs - given my modified rear mounting geometry, and reduced rear weight, this equated to an effective rate of 187.5
this provided a VERY nice ride under moderate conditions - the front had nice give to it, accommodating bumps well, and the rear wasn't bouncing me around - but, start throwing the car around, and it was really depending on the alignment geometry and the tires to stick - it really felt too soft, especially in the rear - at initial set, the car was very balanced - remember, that my intial rate was 190 or so, and the rear was 187.5 - nice balance - then it would load and get stiffer in the front, making the rear seem like it was dragging aroung a bit
also keep in mind that the stock rates are 160f/175r
my thought is to change my rear rate to 300 and the front to 250 - that would give me an effective front of 225 or so and rear of also 225 - the idea here is to firm up the rear, while not losing the front loaded rate, and try to balance the car without making the ride too harsh for street (yes, i know this is a nearly impossible compromise goal)
i realize that the racers out there would spring the car a lot heavier - i would too for a race car - that is not the goal here - this is to remain a street car, but i am looking for better tuning - i also realize that the first instinct is to spring the front more than the rear, by an increase of 10-20% - that is also what i have always done in the past - i was also dealing with a car that was generally 52/48
i know the math works - it's just a bit counter-intuitive, based on experience
here's the question - who else has played around with this? i am looking for input from somebody who has also corner balanced the car - i am working hard to get an even distribution of weight and spring reaction, increase handling and cornering, while not losing ride comfort in a street car
working on the presumption that i have moved the weight around sufficiently to achieve a 50/50 balance at 1/2 tank and including driver, i'm doing this today to see where i am, but i have a couple of days before i can get it back in for it's next alignment (lol - ugh - 9th now in 2 years i think)
thoughts? (besides that i am nuts and should just leave the car alone)
94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com
"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
(This post was last modified: 05-06-2006, 01:34 PM by flash.)

