Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Hi All:
Car has been a bit rough riding, every bump is transmitted to my hands. Checked the easy stuff, wheel bearings are pretty new all around, ball joints seem OK. Then, today, I noticed that there seem to be two bolts missing on the front crossmember, left (drivers) side. I have never noticed this before, probably because of of the way I jacked the car today was different.
Photos attached. Any opinions?
TIA
Pat
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
Posts: 702
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2006
Reputation:
0
Whoa! Check the the threads on those too. Make sure something bad didn't happen in order to allow them to come loose...
Joel Wahlsten
93 968 Amazon Green w/LSD and a few mods
2017 Cayenne GTS Mahogany Metallic
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Thanks, guys! I will try and get some bolts tomorrow. I suspest those have been AWOL for a long time. The 968 is wifey's car, and doesn't get driven much. It's back in the garage resting. Anyone know what bolts those are, spec wise? I can't seem to find my PET Katalog anywhere. Oh, BTW, the bolts ARE in the passenger side, and are pretty tight. The car tracks and brakes pretty straight, so I have no reason to believe the alignment is bad.
Thanks again.
Pat
Edit:
Found a link to the PET...M12x75 bolts.
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
(This post was last modified: 08-19-2012, 10:23 PM by
patkeefe.)
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Really amazing what a couple of 12mm bolts will do to improve the ride!
However, I am kicking myself in the butt for not noticing this sooner.
Thanks again!!
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
Posts: 687
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
0
Amazing that it could have been driven for any length of time with the crossmember free on one side. Hopefully the threads in the frame are still OK. May need to run a tap through them.
Just in case you've destroyed one of them, I repaired a similar issue some years ago by going to the next larger size inch bolt which was fortunately just a little larger than the existing metric that was stripped. I preferred that over using a helicoil.
'92 Midnight Blue 968 Coupe
'94 ProbeGT, Eaton SC@9psi, Quaife, TecGT ECU, 300+HP, body sold, parting out
'98 3000GT VR-4, 400+HP AWD beast, didn't fit w/race helmet, Sold
'93 Bone Stock MX-6 Sold (in '05) sadly to the crusher in 2010
'61 Triumph TR-3, White with red leather interior; My First Car
Posts: 702
Threads: 14
Joined: Sep 2006
Reputation:
0
The threads internal to the unibody were the threads I was referring to. Obviously, if you already threaded them in there and torqued them properly, they are okay. You're a lucky man...
Joel Wahlsten
93 968 Amazon Green w/LSD and a few mods
2017 Cayenne GTS Mahogany Metallic
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Yes, I was lucky all around on this escapade. Luckily, I am a mechanical engineer, and was a machinist when I was in the USAF, so I dealt with a lot of fastener issues.
As much as I hate to even have to bring this up, these two bolts obviously fell out. Bolts don't just fall out if they are installed correctly, and it is safe to say the wifey was not running the Baja 1000 since the last alignment. It has not been on the track since the last alignment. I am ultimately responsible for the safe driving condition of the car (in exchange for cooked food magically appearing before me daily, and clean clothes to wear!)
BTW, I put in grade 8.8 m12x1.5x75 bolts. I don't know the torque specs, but the existing passenger side was at least 90 ft-lb, so I torqued the new ones to that amount. I have no idea what the correct grade bolts and torque for these bolts are. I have no manual for the car (surprise), and there is nothing in my cheap 944 manual.
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
Posts: 516
Threads: 22
Joined: Dec 2011
Reputation:
0
-Matt
1993 Midnight Blue Porsche 968 Cabriolet (toy! Currently under restoration)
1995 Jeep Cherokee (war wagon, Zombie Apocalypse Response Vehicle)
2015 Mazda 3 (my reliable, nice car)
Posts: 687
Threads: 19
Joined: May 2011
Reputation:
0
Just put that part of the car together a couple of weeks ago. The 968 manual calls for the "Cross member to body" M 12 at 85Nm/63ftlb.
90 ft/lb is a lot of torque for an M 12, especially for an 8.8. Check some of your engineering refs. (I'm also an ME.) I'd retorque both sides; you don't want to take a chance in stripping out the welded into the frame nuts. If you are concerned, use some removable loctite on them.
'92 Midnight Blue 968 Coupe
'94 ProbeGT, Eaton SC@9psi, Quaife, TecGT ECU, 300+HP, body sold, parting out
'98 3000GT VR-4, 400+HP AWD beast, didn't fit w/race helmet, Sold
'93 Bone Stock MX-6 Sold (in '05) sadly to the crusher in 2010
'61 Triumph TR-3, White with red leather interior; My First Car
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Matt, thanks for the reference!
MB, I originally was going to 65 ft-lb on the new bolts. Thanks for the sanity check on this.
When I checked the other side, they were AT LEAST 90. So, I went back and jerked the torque up on the new bolts. I don't think I got them to the plastic range, the 8.8 are supposedly 116 kPSI yield. I am getting new bolts for both sides.
The thing about Porsches is that there are some fasteners which are practically off the chart when it comes to torque values. I am just short of the farmer method here...tighten it until it squeaks, then go another 1/4 turn (which is just like 993 Dilivar head studs, IIRC).
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986