This doesn’t make any sense…
The stock cam specs with variocam inactive (basic timing, rpm < 1500, 5500 < rpm) are:
IVO <acronym title='before top dead center'>BTDC</acronym> -7.5
IVC ABDC 52.0
EVO BBDC 31.0
EVC ATDC 1.0
Lobe center 112.5
Overlap -6.5
And with variocam active (torque timing, 1500 < rpm < 5500rpm) are:
IVO <acronym title='before top dead center'>BTDC</acronym> 7.5
IVC ABDC 37.0
EVO BBDC 31.0
EVC ATDC 1.0
Lobe center 105.0
Overlap 8.5
These give intake duration of 224.5 with 11mm lift, and exhaust duration of 212.0 with 10mm lift. I fail to see how using a shorter duration cam profile with less lift would improve the overall volumetric efficiency of the engine? Perhaps it was the other way around, as it is the intake cam that is connected to the timing belt, has longer duration, and higher lift? If they did do something like that it may provide better cylinder scavenging if appropriately balanced with other components.
Pete has helped develop cams for these cars, and while I do not know the specifications of those cams, he may be able to chime in on the affects of various configurations?