Posts: 473
Threads: 81
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation:
0
Hmmmm.... I'm no engine rebuilder, but that's definitely the first time I've ever heard that not stressing an engine will make it wear out quicker. Care to expand a bit, maybe?
Best,
-Mirror
[quote name='flash' date='Jun 7 2006, 08:34 AM']higher revs will expand the rings more, leading to better compression - running low revs doesn't allow that as much, reducing compression, increasing fuel wash and deposits, and thereby promoting premature wear
[right][post="22459"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
1993 968 Coupe 6 speed, GP White, Black/Cashmere - RSBarn Catback, and chip, airbox mod, Euro turn signals, Koni's, M030 Sway Bars, KLA Strut tower brace, Zimmerman rotors, Hawk HPS, SS brake lines
Posts: 473
Threads: 81
Joined: Dec 2005
Reputation:
0
I guess that just doesn't add up for me. I'll have to do some research.
I could see needing high rpms and loads for racing engines, where the heat loads are extreme and the rings are not designed for optimum sealing at lower rpm ranges. Sprint car engines have run gapless rings for a long time be certain of quick and effective cylinder sealing. Not sure if those are still legal though.
http://www.totalseal.com/gaplesss.html
In street engines though, with a vast range of operating temperatures and speeds, I can't see how a manufacturer wouldn't optimize sealing to be when the engine reaches operating temperature....regardless of engine speed. The vast majority of production engines never see the high side of 5000 rpm, even high performance ones. Thus, it seems to me that running the engines in that range (under 5000 or so) should lead to the longest life, not premature wear.
I'm gonna do some reading up on this issue, its interesting!
You're right, back to the original topic. Sorry y'all!
1993 968 Coupe 6 speed, GP White, Black/Cashmere - RSBarn Catback, and chip, airbox mod, Euro turn signals, Koni's, M030 Sway Bars, KLA Strut tower brace, Zimmerman rotors, Hawk HPS, SS brake lines