06-09-2007, 12:30 AM
I've heard nothing but great things about Run-Rite, most recently during a conversation with Pete Fitzpatrick of RS Barn, so I was prepared to take the car in to get it done. But just as an experiment, I thought I'd try it on one of our other cars first, a 2003 Chrysler Town & Country Minivan with 62,000 miles on it (this is probably the only post where you'll see a 968 compared to a minivan!). I expected the minivan to be a worst case situation, because for the last couple of years, it has seen lots of very short trips, primarily the 2 mile drive from my house to the pick-up point for the vanpool I ride to work in. The vehicle is basically a workhorse that gets driven on trips we don't want to subject the other cars to, so I expected its intake to be severely gunked up.
Well, to my surprise and disappointment, the tech who did the treatment told me very little smoke came out, much less than they typically see <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/mad.gif" class="smilie" alt="" /> . The guy seemed pretty knowledgeable, and told me that he has observed that cars that run synthetic oil tend to have much less gunk in their intake systems, and therefore less smoke. As it happens, I run synthetic in all my cars, including the minivan.
Given that the 968 had gotten an oil change an average of every 4000 miles, prior to switching to synthetic at about 70K, and the fact that it has seen about half a dozen DEs which should do a good job of blowing gunk out, I'm now wondering if a Run-Rite treatment wouldn't be a waste of money, as it was on the minivan. The 968 has 98K miles, and has had the injectors cleaned by Marren about a year ago. I've also run Sea Foam through the throttle body about a year ago, and have used Techron (though not as regularly as I should).
For those who have done the Run-Rite treatment, have you seen a lot of smoke come out? And did you really (be honest, now) notice any difference in the way the car drove afterward? Thanks.
Well, to my surprise and disappointment, the tech who did the treatment told me very little smoke came out, much less than they typically see <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/mad.gif" class="smilie" alt="" /> . The guy seemed pretty knowledgeable, and told me that he has observed that cars that run synthetic oil tend to have much less gunk in their intake systems, and therefore less smoke. As it happens, I run synthetic in all my cars, including the minivan.
Given that the 968 had gotten an oil change an average of every 4000 miles, prior to switching to synthetic at about 70K, and the fact that it has seen about half a dozen DEs which should do a good job of blowing gunk out, I'm now wondering if a Run-Rite treatment wouldn't be a waste of money, as it was on the minivan. The 968 has 98K miles, and has had the injectors cleaned by Marren about a year ago. I've also run Sea Foam through the throttle body about a year ago, and have used Techron (though not as regularly as I should).
For those who have done the Run-Rite treatment, have you seen a lot of smoke come out? And did you really (be honest, now) notice any difference in the way the car drove afterward? Thanks.

