Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Lighter weight oils?
#41

Guys, with all due respect, given that the manual actually recommends a wide range of acceptable oil viscosities (and remember that the manual was written before synthetics became commonplace), and that any well-cared for engine can easily last upwards of 150K miles using any oil that falls anywhere within the recommended ranges, aren't statements like "I've always used [fill in the blank] weight oil, and haven't had any issues" a little silly? In other words, to really determine if the weight (and brand) of oil in any given engine is using is "good" or "bad", you'd have to either perform some sort of highly destructive accelerated wear test, or drive it at least 150K miles, tear it apart, and very carefully check all of the clearances. And you'd have to do this to several different engines, all using different weights (and brands?) of oil, making sure that each of the engines are driven as close to identically as possible over the term of the test.

In other words, you'd have to run a carefully controlled experiment over the course of many years, which is utterly impractical. This is why discussion of which is the "right" oil to use can get so passionate (check out www.bobistheoilguy.com to see what I mean) - because any claims, opinions, beliefs, etc., are virtually impossible to prove.

As long as you use a quality oil in the recommended range of viscosities, and change it and the filter at a reasonable interval (5-10K miles, depending on how you drive), you'll be fine. If you're trying to eek out the last horsepower or two in a racing application, then it's a different story, but for most typically-driven cars, sticking to a resonable regimen will reward you with a long engine life (unless a belt snaps - ouch!).

One last point - given the age of our engines, if you're really interested getting the maximum possible life out of your engine, I'd highly recommend doing an oil analysis. I had one done recently by Terrry Dyson (no affiliation), and was amazed at what I learned. My biggest issue is that too much unburnt is getting into my oil, compromising its effectiveness, so Terry recommended some correctivbe measures, the effectiveness of which I'll check with another analysis in 3000 miles. The analysis also showed that my air filter needed cleaning, there was some minor bearing wear (but not enough to warrant replacement yet - the fuel dilution is probably the culprit here), but that there is no water/antifreeze getting into my oil, and that the valvetrain, block, pistons, etc., are in very good shape. I wish I had done this when I got the car five years ago. Again, I would HIGHLY recommend anybody doing this - it could save you thousands of dollars in the long run. Plus, it provides actual data, rather than conjecture.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#42

how does one contact Terry Dyson ? ( or did I miss that somewhere earlier in the thread ..)
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#43

<!--quoteo(post=72882:date=May 31 2009, 01:09 PM:name=ds968)-->QUOTE (ds968 @ May 31 2009, 01:09 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->how does one contact Terry Dyson ? ( or did I miss that somewhere earlier in the thread ..)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Terry's at http://www.dysonanalysis.com/

He's more expensive than other oil analysis companies, but imho, he's well worth it. I've had a couple of anlyses done at other companies, including for the 968, and they missed things that Terry picked up on. Plus, Terry recommended some very specific actions to take, based on my engine's issues, which to me makes his $99 change very reasonable. The proof will come when I do a follow-up analysis in 3000 miles (which is why I'm installing a lever-actuated drain valve); I'll let everybody know how that turns out.

I really should start a new thread about this...
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#44

There's a lot of discussion going on about oils, zinc and phosphorus at another site. http://forums.pelicanparts.com/showthread.php?t=367300
Just to make things a bit more confusing...
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#45

Well after doing some more digging I have updated my knowledge about anti-wear oil additives like the zinc compound ZDDP and molybdenum. I see this was covered briefly in a post here last year, but in case anyone missed it or are new to this stuff (like me!), its important for older engines to use oils with reasonably high levels of ZDDP. New engines can get by with lower levels of ZDDP, and because of the pressure to reduce harmful emissions, many oil companies have lowered ZDDP in oils. For example most Mobil 1 oils have reduced ZDDP except 15W50 and some special racing blends (http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/Moto..._Guide.pdf). Levels of zinc around 1300 ppm seem to be the lower limit recommended for older engines. What does older mean? One guy I've spoken to says anything last century should be using higher ZDDP oils. He also says that he has seen a good correlation between excess wear and disasters and the use of low ZDDP/low viscosity oils in older Porsches like 944s, 968s and 928s.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#46

I spent over an hour " net searching " trying to find which of the current oils have the highest ZDDP levels, and whilst I found tons of discussions on the topic, I could not identify any data that reflects a simple comparison among the brands. Does anyone here know which one of the below has the most ZDDP ?

( all full Syn, of course and in either 5W40 , 10w40, or 15w50 )


Amsoil

Redline

Royal Purple

Mobil 1
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#47

well, i can tell you that it is not mobil 1
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#48

<!--quoteo(post=73514:date=Jun 8 2009, 11:39 AM:name=flash)-->QUOTE (flash @ Jun 8 2009, 11:39 AM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->well, i can tell you that it is not mobil 1<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->


yup, knew M1 reduced the ZDDP but no idea if some or all the others may have also followed suit..
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#49

I just reviewed my recent oil analysis summary, and the zinc levels in my oil (Redline 10W40) were fine; very healthy, in fact, with just over 5000 miles on the oil).

But again, I would strongly urge anybody with questions or concerns about what type of oil they should be using, the overall health of their engine, questions about additives, etc., to get an oil analysis done by a qualified, highly experienced professional. I perused bobisthoilguy extensively before having my recent analysis done, and one name kept coming up: Terry Dyson, so I went with him, and am very pleased with the quality and quantity Terry of information was able to provide me. There is so much conjecture, hype, and just plain misinformation in the field of engine lubrication (again, largely because the results of any particular action take years to appear, and even then, there are too many variables to draw reliable conclusions), that the best course is to send a sample of oil to somebody who does this for living. It's money very well spent.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#50

<!--quoteo(post=73524:date=Jun 8 2009, 05:03 PM:name=ds968)-->QUOTE (ds968 @ Jun 8 2009, 05:03 PM) <{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->yup, knew M1 reduced the ZDDP but no idea if some or all the others may have also followed suit..<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

They actually kept up the ZDDP levels on the 15w50 oil. They are at a level that is appropriate for our vehicle, and is bascially the same as Redline and Amsoil and the others for ZDDP levels. But thats only for the 15w50 variety.

Here is the chart, and independant labs have tested it to be true.
http://www.mobiloil.com/USA-English/MotorO...oduct_Guide.pdf
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

Current:
2016 Cayman S
Former:
94 968 Cab 6 Spd. Black/Cashmere D1R SC
86.5 928 Garnet Red Metallic
Reply
#51

I have been running Royal Purple for 2 years now and all I can really add is that I'm happy with it.
Even helped a low oil pressure reading I was getting.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#52

I stocked up on my usual and customary Amsoil for the oil change coming up in a couple of weeks, and asked the Amsoil dealer while I was there if there is any probem mixing 10/40 with 5/40 weights - say, 3W Qts of 10 and 3.5 Qts of 5W - he said absolutely not a problem, and claims people have done that in sports cars and racing cars for decades, mixing their own weights blended to suit whatever needs and/or climates !

BTW, ( supposedly ) the Amsoil 10/40 carries the highest levels of ZDDP of any brands out there which I understand is a good thing, so I'm going to run the car for the next 10k miles or so on the new and improved
7.5 W 40 formula [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img]
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#53

the only issue i have is the zinc versus moly - redline is very high in moly, which is the best thing out there for high load protection - it should do better when new than the amsoil

however, amsoil seems to last longer, and provide more protection longer, in straight 30, according to some tests i can find that come from their site,and are plastered all over the web

very conflicting and confusing information - sure wish i could find a head to head comparison of 10-40
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#54

How about Brad Penn? High in zddp. High on HTHS.

//TL
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#55

Bringing an old thread back from the dead...



I'm about ready to change the oil in the 968 with 5W40 Mobil 1 TDT. It is the recommended oil for the Metzger motored 911s, and is built with a higher ZDDP count. What are you guys still using?



I have Mobil 1 15W50 in the car now, but it's getting tougher to find. I'm willing to switch to Amsoil or Redline, but have the Mobil 1 TDT in the garage.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#56

I'd recomment this highly scientific selection process. Print out the labels from each of the candidate oil brands (Amsoil, Redline, Royal Purple, Mobil 1, Walmart Special, etc.), and tape them to the wall. Hold a push-pin or dart in your hand, blindfold yourself, have someone spin you around a few times, and then walk toward the wall and insert the pin. Order a case of the oil you've selected.



Seriously, I find all this conjecture about ZDDP and/or moly or additive of your choice to be pretty dubious. If there was some "magic" level of additives that managed to produce superior results, all the oil manufacturers would be using it. There are just way too many variables to make a data-driven oil selection decision. And if anybody claims their engine runs better on this oil vs. the other, politely excuse yourself and walk the other way. Sorry about the cynicism...
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#57

I would also think that using any given one of the recommended oil brands mentioned in this thread vs any other one will not necessarily make your car function materially better or worse in the short run, but I think in terms of engine longevity using a top end oil vs some cheap one you might find at discount chain stores or ones used by the 5 minute quick-lube places, will make a differnce and you're probably risking a lot by going with the latter.. I think that also applies to gasoline, the additives used by various brand name gas stations have material differences among them, and when eventually you open up an engine you will most definitely notice a huge difference ( my mechanic who has taken apart Porsches and BMWs, and Mercedes engines for 30 years will absolutely attest to how crappy and bogged down with grime and carbon and various other "muck" engines which have run on cheap oil and gas are vs those that run on top grade oil and gas..). Little doubt this affects performance as well as longevity.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#58

Seems we're about where we were at a couple of years ago... Well, with the exception of Cloud being a bit more cynical than last timeSmile This seems to be a set of conditions without a defined answer.



I also run only Shell or Chevron in the gas tank and will stick with Mobil 1 TDT or an equivalent. My motor already has 113k on it and still runs like a top. I wouldn't touch a no-name oil with a 10 foot pole. I'll try the TDT and get it analyzed next year or 5000 miles whatever comes first.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#59

My 30 year P-mechanic doesn't seem to have much trouble with oil decisions - Everything out, Motul in.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#60

I had good luck with Motul brake fluids, but have never used their oil.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread / Author Replies Views Last Post
Last Post by Jamie '92 968
11-23-2011, 04:49 PM
Last Post by flash
10-30-2010, 10:09 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)