Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Yes, some of the tire wear is due to the negative rear camber which I evidently have in the rear suspension. One can look at my avatar and see how much body roll exists in this cab, which is why I have the poor man's solution of increased camber. I will have to get the camber back to whatever the factory said, as that car may never see the track again.
Boxster eats rear street tires at the rate of 3:1 versus front tires. 911 is surprisingly not as bad as the Boxster. My DOT-R track tires wear about the same F-R, and I have run those tires on both the Boxster and the 911
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
I think I have zero braces. I do have a cheap Autopower roll bar, but I don't count on that too much for stiffening.
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
Update:
I put new Yokohama "S-Drive" tires on the rear, 275/40-17. The fronts were good. It fixed the ride a bit. The car is much quieter mow, but still somewhat skittish. I did notice yesterday that it does indeed have some of that drag racer F-R/R-F quick weight transfer, so maybe my shocks are worn some. This is really noticeable when at speed and throttle steering, very touchy and quick to understeer.
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986
Posts: 88
Threads: 16
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation:
0
New Bilstein HD shocks in the rear have really helped with ride quality, and cut out a lot of the rattling noises. Next is to examine the front components and see what they look like, and to get the rear ride height down a bit. The car has about a 1" difference rear to front, which I guess is due to the bumper regulations at the time.
Pat Keefe
78 911 SC
92 968 Cab
01 986