<!--quoteo(post=74686:date=Jun 29 2009, 05:53 AM:name=flash)-->QUOTE (flash @ Jun 29 2009, 05:53 AM)
<{POST_SNAPBACK}><!--quotec-->i'm in california where emissions standards are currently much more strict - the cat was a much bigger priority for me - i haven't had a chance to really run the car yet to see what other changes have occurred, or if i lost anything significant in horsepower up top - it doesn't feel like it, but i won't really know for a while
regardless though, this was not a direct fit by any stretch of the imagination - it took some doing to get it in there, and i'm not sure how easily the factory cat would fit with the rs barn cat-back
pete has done plenty of testing with the cat he uses - if emissions are not a concern where you are, i would run what he sends you<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Emissions are somewhat of an issue but not a deal-breaker. I can get anything to work and have the resources to get it done right. My concern is ultimately the loss/gains in power. If the RSBARN is not going to gain me anything, then I would rather spend the money on other items, for RSBARN of course [img]style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/rolleyes.gif[/img]
I sounds like both are good but it may depend on the modifications. I am not engineer but am I off base if I hypothesis the following:
With increased exhaust flow, more back-pressure needed, hence the stock cat works better
With stock exhaust flow, less back-pressure needed, hi-flow cat will gain more.
Just thinking out loud.