[968forums]

The Search Tool on this site is an excellent aid in finding information for which you are looking. It does, however, require understanding how it works, and what things help narrow results.



Also, it is only as good as the parameters you enter. If you enter the wrong term, it won't find what you want. You need to learn the correct terms for many things technical in nature. This requires doing some reading. We highly recommend poking around on the site and reading as much as you can. You will find this both informative, and of great assistance in understanding how the site works, where things are, and what has already been discussed.



To start with, ALWAYS click on the little gear next to the search bar. Never just use the search bar. By clicking on the gear, you will open the search area where you can then avail yourself of better search tools.



Next enter the word or words you want to use to search for something. Be as specific as you can. Remember that the broader the search words, the more unrelated results you will get.



Then, once you have figured out the words you want to use to search for something, choose whether or not you want the results in topics, titles, or both.



Use the "posted by" feature if you know who might have posted what you are looking for.



Choose what area in which to search (forums, members, etc).



Choose a category if you think it might be in a specific location. This will narrow your results.



If you know a window of dates something may have been posted in, enter that in the appropriate boxes.



Choose whether you want to see the results in topics or in posts. This can reduce the reading you might have to do in order to find what you are looking for.



We hope that this will help you to understand how to better use the Search Tool. It is actually very effective, when used properly. Used improperly, it is no better than trying to tighten a nut with a screwdriver.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[flash]

the poll results so far are pretty much as i expected. most people find it very helpful. some didn't know what it could do. now that they do, i feel confident they too will find it useful.



i find it difficult to imagine that, if everything has been read, so as to know what terms to use, and the tools fully utilized, that anything that is actually there cannot be found. if there is something, i would love to see examples. if there is something to fix, we can look at fixing it. however, so far, i have not had anything that i could not find, once i figured out what parameters to use. a search engine is a simple tool though. it has no bias, and unless it has a learning component (ours does not) does not work differently one time than the next. it's just all about knowing how to use it.



do i wish there were other things added to the search tool? sure. does it get the job done as is? so far, yup

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[mbardeen]

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. The search tool has some rather large failings (even the advanced search). Specifically, searches that don't work as expected such as:

' "engine oil" best '

and

' engine oil best '



It connects each part of the search with an OR, so you get results that don't contain the word best, even though the ALL WORDS option is specificed in the search.



Add that to the fact that you have to wait 20 seconds between searches, so when you realize you searched for the wrong thing and go to correct it, you have to sit twiddling your thumbs.



For anyone who knows anything about search engines (I can find anything on google), it's just an excercise in frustration. So instead of wasting my time seaching for information here, I just go to google. I understand that it's a limitation of the software, but continuing to insist that it's operator error (like is insuated in the poll) is deeply insulting.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[Paul W]

I agree the waiting for the search engine can by annoying. Additionally, having to wait three minutes to post to the same post can be annoying also, considering only 5 pictures are allowed in each post. If this is a closed forum why have these rules?

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[tamathumper]

mbardeen, don't get upset. This poll isn't serious, it's just a jab at the user population - calling them lazy and impatient.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[Eric_Oz_S2]

I'm so used to using google now to search forums (except this forum that doesn't search) as it works so much better.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[flash]

it is not a jab at anyone.



the search engine works perfectly. you cannot expect it to find something that is not there. for example, there is no "best engine oil" so you won't find it. it indexes every word entered. it can find any word or word combination that has been entered. it will not find combinations that are not there.



it's only as good as what you put in it. garbage in - garbage out.



i will quickly address the other two points, and then get back on topic.

the 5 pictures limit is there because we really want you to use the gallery when there are that many shots, and not post within a thread. there is no reason to put more than 5 pictures in a thread. DIYs should be a pdf. everything else should go in the gallery with a link to it within the thread.



the time limit is to prevent spamming. if somebody managed to slip in, they could pollute many threads very quickly. we've seen it happen on other sites. that does not happen here, and for good reason.



back on topic



our search engine capability is certainly not like that of google, and never will be, but it works and works well for what it is. you just have to learn how to use it. i maintain that those who are having problems, just aren't applying themselves enough.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[bombfactory]

My poll answer is: I didn't know it had those extra features! I didn't realize the 'little flower' to the right of the search field was clickable, and the key to enlightenment. Thanks Flash!

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[flash]

no worries. i'm going to include the search tutorial into the site tutorial soon. i'm working on a number of additions to that. hopefully people will read it, and it will help them

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[94SilverCab]

[quote name='Paul W' timestamp='1384783696' post='152424']

I agree the waiting for the search engine can by annoying. Additionally, having to wait three minutes to post to the same post can be annoying also, considering only 5 pictures are allowed in each post. If this is a closed forum why have these rules?

[/quote]



Paul,



You write really good descriptive DIYs...sadly, they will be lost in the sands of time because of the way you write them. Your contribution to this site would be 100 times better if you would write your DIYs (with pictures) and submit them as pdf files.





JMHO,



Jay

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[biosurfer1]

"the search engine works perfectly. "



Of course it works perfectly, I bet whoever designed it thought of everything. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/glare.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />



"but it works and works well for what it is"



Er...perfectly? or well for what it is?





"it's only as good as what you put in it. garbage in - garbage out."



jab jab jab jab





"i maintain that those who are having problems, just aren't applying themselves enough."



jab jab jab



Did you really start a poll so you could tell the people who voted they don't think the search works well how dumb they are, they're wrong it's perfect and they just aren't trying hard enough. <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/rolleyes.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[Bulti]

I think it works just fine. Sometimes even Google can't provide the answers you seek, so why would this search engine be perfect?



Too much whining, not enough searching.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[flash]

lol - people can take it how they want. the fact is that the search engine does exactly what it is supposed to. it doesn't do what it is not designed to do. it responds to what you input, and pulls all matches. if there are no matches, it won't respond. if you don't input the right stuff, you won't get what you want as a result. it won't give you "this might be it" results.



frankly i don't care if people use it or not. i didn't design it. it comes with the package. it works fine for everybody i know who has spent the time to figure out how it works, and to learn the terminology.



anybody who knows me, knows that i'll step right up and tell somebody they're dumb or lazy. at present i'm leaving it up to them to figure that out.



i'm so sick and tired of the whining from the cheap seats. i'm so ready to shut this place down, it's just silly. what do you want for free?



as soon as somebody wants to cut me a $42,857 check, they can decide how they want to run the site, and i'll be on my way. until then, buck up, learn the terminology and how to use the search engine, or shut the hell up.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[Bulti]

[quote name='flash' timestamp='1384804981' post='152457'] i'm so sick and tired of the whining from the cheap seats. i'm so ready to shut this place down, it's just silly. what do you want for free?

[/quote]



One should be careful to give too many negative comments. This is a non-profit initiative and so all the effort that goes in it is usually carried by a few very unselfish people.



Pretty much obvious. My humble opinion.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[banditsc]

[quote name='Bulti' timestamp='1384806157' post='152459']

One should be careful to give too many negative comments. This is a non-profit initiative and so all the effort that goes in it is usually carried by a few very unselfish people.



Pretty much obvious. My humble opinion.

[/quote]



Exactly, it's a free site run by people volunteering there time and dollars for no profit. While constructive observations are always welcome the constant complaining and griping gets a little old. It's free, it is what it is, we have to make the best of it for what it is.

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[flash]

and let me stop to take a moment to thank, beyond all description, he who has been there all along helping us out

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[94SilverCab]

Now, if we had $600 Million we could make a really good website...er, maybe not...



Jay

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[banditsc]

Yes, I hear there is a pretty good company up in Canada that could make us a great website... <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/smile.png" class="smilie" alt="" />

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[ryker]

I did not know about some of the additional search functions but it still worked for my needs. I'm looking forward to using these features.



I have to say that I have never posted to a forum before this one. I appreciate the requirement to post an introduction, as well as additional posts to access additional features, as these made me get out of my comfort zone and contribute.



Oh yeah, and I would like to thank the team of volunteers who run the site! (sarcasm intended, Flash)

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

[Inkedupfatboy]

mmmphhh mmmpphhhh mmmpphhhh mmmpppphhhh



Duct tape is my friend - lol

Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.