10-13-2011, 08:33 AM
I live near the epicenter of racing and as is usually the case, rumors are always available if you want to listen. It seems as though a manufacturer in a very popular racing series is starting to push their weight around with their engine program. The requirement reportedly is that the individual teams associated with this manufacturer are no longer able to build their own engines. In some cases this has lead to local employment losses for those in the engine departments. Engines now are delivered complete. Teams are allowed to tweek them a bit, but not allowed to tear them down, rebuild them, or modify them. Post race the engines must be returned to the manufacturer. Keep in mind, this is not a sealed engine series built on a formula, but rather an open team and manufacturer series. Unless you were really paying attention to recent races, you wouldn’t notice the drop off that a few of the cars had with the new program. The engines have not lived up to all of the hype. One thing is certainly clear, you will not hear about it from the drivers, team members, or the owners. Why? Follow the money and legal ramifications of commenting publically and you can see why everyone is quiet. Not even the displaced employees are talking.
So this got me thinking…does this seem right? Should a manufacturer of a product (performance or otherwise) have so much control over free speech? Does this go against “the American Way” and free enterprise? Shouldn’t a manufacturer have to be exposed to the rigors of the free market to prove the worth of a product? It’s a shame that legal manipulation of people cannot be exposed for what it really is and that the masses are not made aware of the behind the scenes contracts that silence free speech.
So this got me thinking…does this seem right? Should a manufacturer of a product (performance or otherwise) have so much control over free speech? Does this go against “the American Way” and free enterprise? Shouldn’t a manufacturer have to be exposed to the rigors of the free market to prove the worth of a product? It’s a shame that legal manipulation of people cannot be exposed for what it really is and that the masses are not made aware of the behind the scenes contracts that silence free speech.

