Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

sometimes porsche is pretty amazing
#1

for some time now, i have been working on creating a new upper strut mount, as the OEM unit fails over time, and has limits to how much spring rate it can handle. on top of that, it is a pretty pricey part, floating around $500 each.



this part locates the strut shaft and holds it centered in the strut tower. it flexes a bit to absorb bumps, by means of a rubber molded outer encapsulating a bearing.



it's really a pretty ingenious design. it even has a tilt built into it to accommodate an angular tip of the strut (yes, the bearing inside is at an angle). this allows the springs to hold a high effective rate, while still centering the strut. you can see the angle in this shot (new one on the left. old one on the right)

   



i looked at a bunch of the different aftermarket units, and found that none of them use spherical bearings, which would accommodate that tilt. i'm not sure if it's because of the cost, or because of wear failure though. the problem is that if you don't have the tilt built in, you reduce effective spring rate, alter camber angles, and also create an uneven load on the strut tower. this can result in tragic failure. i've seen a few strut towers ripped out now, and it was always on a car with either a super stiff strut tower brace, a camber plate, or both. if it walks like a duck........



so, i started looking at the design to see what i could do. in doing that i also noticed that my mounts are starting to go. i replaced them a few years ago when i installed the first set of struts. however, they are already showing signs of failure. you can see this from the way the upper plate is pushing upward and inward.

   



you can also see how the bottom of the mount on the unit on the right in the pic below is being pushed upward due to wear. the spring is constantly pushing upward against the bearing, which takes the rubber upward with it.

   



stiff springs add load to the bearing, which causes the rubber to be stretched more than stock springs. this wears the unit out prematurely. were the rubber to rip, there is nothing to stop the strut shaft from punching a hole in the hood. obviously i want a stiffer suspension than stock, but i'm not looking to keep dealing with these parts, and sure don't want to see a strut shaft poking up through my hood.



the existing camber plates don't accommodate the tilt, and result in too much harsh impact being transmitted to the car. i prefer a smoother ride.



so, i am trying to figure out a mount that has a bearing that is encapsulated in rubber, so as to absorb the bumps, and also accommodates the tilt. it would also have built into it a mechanism to prevent failure.



this is definitely going to be a challenge. porsche really did a pretty danged good job of engineering this piece. it just can't handle the loads i want to subject it to. but until i come up with something, i have to keep changing these.



ah, another slippery slope. yeah. that's a big shocker.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#2

Glad to have you on this Flash, as I'm pretty sure all of us could use new ones.



What I want to know is, why in the world does a new 968 strut mount cost $500? That is insane! WTF Porsche!?
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#3

WOW! Very informative, I have wondered about these parts and how they work and when one would know to change them.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#4

lol - the answer is easy. profit.



they used to make a less expensive model, which was used in the 944. but a lot of guys figured out they could buy that one, remove the weight and weld it onto the new one, and be way ahead.



porsche then decided to cancel the less expensive one and only carry the expensive one.



nice, huh?



i'm quite a way off from a new design though. don't expect that one any time soon. it's really buggering my stiffer strut tower brace design too.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#5

This is onlly a "stop gap" and not the full answer, but seeing Flash's photos and comments, I am going to design an X brace that will more or less "cap" the strut mount and attach to the four existing bolts, either under or on top of the strut brace... probably on top of the brace, as I don't want to raise the height of the brace brackets... I am thinking of having it machined from 6061 alloy plate... will post photos. With a bit of metal polish, it will not only contain the strut mount, but add a bit of Bling to our babies! Now that I am retired, time to get back on the drafting table!!!
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#6

nooooo!!!!



the threads on the 4 mount bolts are NOT up to that task. they are very low quality, and are well known for stripping. that is the reason i had to design in a certain amount of flex into the strut tower brace. i had seen too many cars with stripped threads due to loads there being too high.



if you want to do what you are talking about, remove the mounts, and knock out the pressed in studs and replace them with better hardware.



what you are talking about is something i have been considering as a part of the stiffer strut brace
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#7

I can attest to the weakness of the strut mount bolts. Trying to remove my original struts to install my new ones, half of the bolts 'let go' due to gummed up threads (they're just weakly pressed in, kinda like the bolts that hold on the rear wing :-) and had to be grabbed from below, inside the fender well, with vice grips to get the nuts off. Not fun!
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#8

yup - the threads themselves aren't much better. if i had to guess, the studs are something like grade 2. they sure don't hold much torque before stripping.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#9

Flash I would be prepared to pitch in and get something going with this. E-mail me a pdf sketch of the cup area with the strut in place and I will try to help solve it. Plus I have the machining facility and materials readily available.



Andy
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#10

Yikes! looked at my own car just now and I need this done, badly! Pedal to the metal Bob, let's get this going!



Andy
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#11

i've got the design. that was the easy part. the hard part is going to be sourcing the rubber. i need to do some tests to find the material that will rebound without transmitting too much jarring, and yet not compress under the pounding.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#12

I have to put my hand up and admit that when I read this thread today I had no idea that the mount was rubber, my jaw dropped a mile! What I want to ask is, the area of contact between the strut and rubber mount, can that be increased to reduce load, by inserting a load bearing metal barrier between them? The reason I ask this is because the top of shock absorbers haven't really got acres of metal surface. This at least would provide some help, if maybe falling short of a total solution. Having tests done shoud not be a great barrier, what's important is that the test piece is new so to record the correct values, as rubber ages its properties will change, becoming harder, more brittle etc. There's a member of the forum who works for a tyre company I think, he should be able to get a sample analysed correctly for properties and composition.



Andy
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#13

Ahhh... very good point on the weakness of the strut mount bolts... the accountants must have had a hand in picking the quality of these parts!

Well, back to the drawing board on this idea! Bob, I like the idea of incorporating a "cage" with a new design strut brace, and of course, new bolts as well....
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#14

i've been trying to work out a "cage" and the problem with the OEM mount is that it moves a LOT. you can see just how much by the clearances they put into the hood frame. having a cage that can contain the mount, while allowing the movement, is going to be tough.



we'll see.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#15

flash,

can you call me , need the number/address of the guy who can fix the de-laminating rear hatch window

thanks
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#16

This post brings up a question I've had since I replaced these mounts a couple of weeks ago... What is the purpose of the arcs of thicker metal on the upper-inside portion of the mount? (I think this is the piece Flash mentions previously welding to 944 mounts.) Is it some sort of vibration damper or what?



Not necessary, but I can definitely echo the surprise about the relative flimsiness of the construction of this whole are of the car -- the bolts, the bearing in rubber, and even that the fender housing is not more reinforced. Definitely sub-par relative to the overall quality of the car and an odd place to skimp imo.



I'm not an engineer, but my thought about an improvement in the design of the mount: a spherical bearing encased in a steel plate, maybe 1/8 thick, that is the same diameter as the rubber portion of the mount which is then then sandwiched between two rubber pieces. So, essentially, you end-up with something maybe 1/8" taller than currently, the same amount of rubber, but with the stresses more evenly distributed across the new plate and therefore more evenly across the other rubber and metal pieces. (?) -- of course this would no doubt make it a $1,000 part instead of merely $500.



BTW -- I've been working with the guys at www.partsheaven.com (a just-Porsche wrecking yard) in Hayward, CA for lots of parts and they've been unbelievable. They heard I was going to replace these and instead found me what looked like new mounts and sold them to me for, I think, about $75 each -- no kidding. Super helpful guys too.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#17

you are bang on



they are supposed to dampen wiggles in the suspension. the mount locations changed a bit from the 944 to the 968, and i guess between the added weight, and the change in the geometry, it resulted in some jittering.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.

94 Midnight Metallic Blue Cab Porsche 968 w/deviating cashmere/black interior and WAY too many mods to list - thanks to eric for creating www.968forums.com



"It isn't nearly as expensive to do it right as it is to do it wrong."
Reply
#18

thanks. hard to believe something that small could make much of a difference, but I suppose that shows the stresses and sensitivity of that piece and why the better piece you're after could make a big difference.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#19

Ok Bob, so we've talked about suspension mods this winter because I feel the car is sloppy as it sits. I was out waxing the ol' girl today as she lies fallow and lonely in the garage for the next 6 months and I had this thread pop into my head while under the hood.

Could this be part of my problem? After all they are only 18 years old <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/rolleyes.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply
#20

Yup, another candidate for Flash's upcoming (hopefully) super duper street strut mounts.
Partial Post: Please Login or Register to read the full post.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)