Posts: 149
Threads: 17
Joined: Jul 2009
Reputation:
0
I do have the carnewal one now, and find it much better than any of the fibreglass options having tried both. ie: this is my third splitter and the polyurethane is heaps better than the fibreglass versions. It bends, not breaks (to a point). I also have it between the bumper and the lower air dam, so all air flow is still in place just fine from undertray. I think GT3 front splitter fasters were the go to achieve that. I vaguely recall, but cant garauntee, that carnewall threw them in too.
I wont bother with a fibreglass one again, they are a toy vs this one from my experiences to date.
968CS-outright Porsche Australia NSW Drivers Championship winning car 2011, 2012
968CS-Porsche NSW Drivers Championship class winning car 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012
911 GT2 - "The Beast"
BMW M3 Individual - the perfect daily driver
(This post was last modified: 12-15-2010, 05:34 AM by
MC968CS.)
Posts: 401
Threads: 56
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation:
0
I have an AIR splitter (glass) that I coated with a layer of carbon fiber (600 g per m2) for both looks and durability. It is in stock form very thin and totally not streetable but on the track that can have benefits as you can tear the splitter to shreds without it taking the nose with it to the grave. The fit was splendid in my case but that wouldn't seem to be the situation for everyone.
1995 Riviera blue 968CS with LSD, custom LEDA coilovers with t-bar delete, S4 brakes, RS Barn braided lines, Tarett sways, Racers Edge bushings everywhere, Rack Tack, Design 1 braces and short shift kit, air box mod, RS Barn stage 1 chip, RS Barn cat back, RUF BTR2 wheels with Toyo R888, Deutsch Nine TRS version 2 rear wing (carbon fiber), AIR repop splitter (carbon fiber), brake cooling intakes (carbon fiber), Sparco seats and belts, OMP steering wheel and a lot of other little things that I can't recall at the moment...