Posts: 36
Threads: 10
Joined: Jan 2006
Reputation:
0
Sorry if this has been covered before, and sorry for the newbie question...
The top picture is a 92 968; the second picture is a 94. There is a semicircular "ridge" on top of the struts of the 94; it appears the 92 does not have this ridge. Why the difference?
Thanks in advance.
Joe
Joe
1995 968 Coupe
Guards Red/Black
Posts: 191
Threads: 13
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
The 92 in the top picture has the Koni adjustable struts that are part of the M030 option package. The 94 has the standard struts.
mike
----
93 911 C2 Coupe
95 Black 968 M030 Coupe (R.I.P.)
Posts: 191
Threads: 13
Joined: Apr 2005
Reputation:
0
I had to go out the garage to check. I was mistaken....Doh!! <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/unsure.gif" class="smilie" alt="" /> My '95 M030 also has the ridge. Could it be that the non-M030 cars don't have the ridge? Or maybe the earlier model years don't have them. Now I need to know too.
mike
----
93 911 C2 Coupe
95 Black 968 M030 Coupe (R.I.P.)
Posts: 1,511
Threads: 51
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation:
0
Porsche's answer to any problem was to add a dampner or ballast. I had a 66 911 that had huge cast-iron weights molded into the front bumper. This was never advertised, but it was to help balance.
I think the weights on the strut bearing caps are to keep a noise problem from occuring. One of mine has fallen off and I can tell no difference though.
Lets talk about the big ass weight in the back of the cabs.
The list most likely goes on......
92 968 cab (cobalt blue/black top/grey int)
87 944S
19 Audi A6 3.0T
03 Toyota Tundra