08-15-2006, 08:53 AM
08-15-2006, 11:38 AM
sure wish i could see that
08-15-2006, 03:01 PM
Flash, check your email.
08-15-2006, 04:18 PM
Is the black line the blue line? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/smile.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
08-16-2006, 06:40 AM
[quote name='chris' date='Aug 16 2006, 05:48 AM']Is the black line the blue line? <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/smile.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
[right][post="25306"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
actually, the dark blue line is the blue line <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/tongue.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
[right][post="25306"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
actually, the dark blue line is the blue line <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/tongue.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
08-16-2006, 11:49 AM
[quote name='sparky' date='Aug 16 2006, 05:40 AM']actually, the dark blue line is the blue line <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/tongue.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
[right][post="25326"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
Ok well, I took a squizz at it <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/biggrin.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
So the AFR changed from steadily declining, to steadily inclining? Interesting...
Not much change in power though, unless I'm missing something?
[right][post="25326"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
Ok well, I took a squizz at it <img src="/forum/images/smilies/968/biggrin.gif" class="smilie" alt="" />
So the AFR changed from steadily declining, to steadily inclining? Interesting...
Not much change in power though, unless I'm missing something?
08-16-2006, 08:16 PM
Yeah, I'm a little puzzled, too. The vertical axis is 4 hp per division, so it looks like a negligible gain in power, and no modification of the curve as a function of rpm. Yet so many people swear by this chip. What gives?
08-17-2006, 10:38 AM
[quote name='Cloud9...68' date='Aug 16 2006, 07:16 PM']Yeah, I'm a little puzzled, too. The vertical axis is 4 hp per division, so it looks like a negligible gain in power, and no modification of the curve as a function of rpm. Yet so many people swear by this chip. What gives?
[right][post="25356"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
In the test I did with the ProMax 7100 chip, there was a good 10 hp and 10 ft-lb increase across the board, peaking at an 11.5 hp/ft-lb increase, as compared to the factory chip. I didn't test any other chips but my understanding is that most are within a hp/ft-lb or two of each other.
--Bob
[right][post="25356"]<{POST_SNAPBACK}>[/post][/right][/quote]
In the test I did with the ProMax 7100 chip, there was a good 10 hp and 10 ft-lb increase across the board, peaking at an 11.5 hp/ft-lb increase, as compared to the factory chip. I didn't test any other chips but my understanding is that most are within a hp/ft-lb or two of each other.
--Bob
08-17-2006, 11:48 AM
this is dangerous territory - the dyno has everything to do with it - i cannot stress enough that you CANNOT compare one test to another - conditions, dynos, and cars would HAVE to be matched exactly to get the same results twice
i don't want to get into more comparisons, or further arguments about which chip does what - we all know how ugly that gets - so, let's keep this focused on this test
the afr curve there on this chart is what concerns me
i don't want to get into more comparisons, or further arguments about which chip does what - we all know how ugly that gets - so, let's keep this focused on this test
the afr curve there on this chart is what concerns me